The Research Subway Map
What this module teaches: how to stay on one chain of questions to its end, what to do when a source answers a question from a different chain, and why breaking that discipline is where cognitive overload comes from. The mental model is a subway map: each chain is a colored line, each question–answer pair a station. This map adds two things chains really do: lines that share track — two chains riding the same rails until the moment they genuinely diverge — and a final intersection chart that fills in as you ride, showing how just three cases answer nine questions across three lines.
Before boarding
Your client tripped over a tree stump left in the shared courtyard path of her apartment complex. To hold the landlord liable, three chains of questions have formed — but look at the map: two of them leave the first station on the same rails.
Duty Line — what must a landlord do about shared spaces, exactly?
Notice Line — must the landlord have known about the stump? (It can’t leave the station until a duty exists — so it rides the Duty Line’s rails at first.)
Standard Line — what makes a condition “unsafe” at all?
The intersection chart
The map, kept as a researcher would keep it: stations down the side, sources across the top. Cells fill as you ride — each dot takes the color of the line its station belongs to, so a case that crosses lines shows a column of mixed colors.
| Station · question | Whitaker v. Sable Court | Pruett v. Alder Gate | Beale v. Juniper Row |
|---|---|---|---|
| E Elements of the claim | |||
| D Duty over shared spaces? | |||
| D1 Outdoor walks count? | |||
| D2 Duty to inspect? | |||
| N1 Knowledge required? | |||
| N2 Constructive notice standard | |||
| N3 Proving notice | |||
| U1 What is “unsafe”? | |||
| U2 Foresight, and proof |
The subway rules
What you just practiced, as rules you can carry.